- The Sideline
- Posts
- Could a Lawsuit Reshape the Future of Tennis?
Could a Lawsuit Reshape the Future of Tennis?
Breaking down a historic lawsuit that carries significant implications š¾

The future of professional tennis is unclear.
The Professional Tennis Players Association (āPTPAā), founded just six years ago, isnāt messing around. Last Tuesday, the players association filed a historic lawsuit to āsaveā the sport.
Just read the title of the press release for the lawsuit it filed:
āThe PTPA and Tennis Players File Historic Legal Actions Against Governing Bodies Exposing Corrupt, Illegal, and Abusive Systemā
Corrupt. Illegal. Abusive. Thatās one way to describe the system.
Also in the press release, the PTPA states the major tennis governing bodies āoperate as a cartel by implementing a number of draconian, interlocking anticompetitive restraints and abusive practices.ā
The reason for filing the lawsuit?
According to PTPA Executive Director Ahmad Nassar, āFixing these systemic failures isnāt about disrupting tennisāitās about saving it for the generations of players and fans to come.ā
Hereās what the PTPA is alleging:
Parties to the Action
Here are the individuals and organizations involved in the lawsuit:
Plaintiffs (on offense):
Twelve professional tennis players, including PTPA co-founder Vasek Pospisil, on behalf of themselves and, according to the players association, ābacked overwhelmingly by the top 250+ menās and womenās players including a majority of the Top 20 players.ā
The Professional Tennis Players Association
Defendants (on defense):
Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP)
Womenās Tennis Association (WTA)
International Tennis Federation (ITF)
International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA)
The Complaint
Filed in the Southern District of New York, the 163-page complaint alleges the defendants violated antitrust law in several ways, including unlawfully restraining player compensation and other professional opportunities.
The press release highlights several arguments made throughout the complaint.
Here are some of the major arguments and evidence the PTPA points to in support:
Price Fixing
The defendants illegally collude to cap both (i) the prize money players make on the court and (ii) the opportunities players earn off the court.
More than two billion people across 200 countries tuned in to watch tennis last year.
Tennis players are paid 17% of revenues, compared to athletes from other pro sports like golf, basketball and football, which range between 35-50%.
In 2024, the U.S. Open made $12.8M from the āhoney deuceā specialty cocktail ā more than the amount paid to both single champions combined.


Charts: Lev Akabas, Source: ATP Media Guides
Ranking Points System and Anticompetitive Effect
The defendants ādraconianā system dictates (i) which tournaments players are able to compete in, (ii) sponsorship opportunities, and (iii) total compensation earned.
This system simultaneously prevents players from competing in alternative events that could exist in a free market and prevents potential competitors from entering the market.
By only awarding points to players who compete in defendantās tournaments, the system āfunnels players away from alternative events,ā where they could earn additional compensation.
Player Schedule and Playing Conditions
The pro tennis season lasts 11 months per year which makes little time for rest, recovery, and family time. Players have to spend their own money to travel and compete in tournaments across six continents.
Last year, players were forced to compete in 100-degree heat, causing one player to collapse on the court in Miami. Players are forced to compete in matches that end at 3:00 a.m., and use āinjury-inducingā tennis balls.
In response to these conditions, players are told āthis is what comes with the privilege of being a professional tennis player.ā
An infographic posted on PTPAās X account
Exploiting NIL and Violating Privacy Rights
Players are forced to sign over their NIL rights for no compensation in return, which prevents them from entering into independent sponsorships. The governing bodies limit the number of sponsors a player may have.
Defendants conduct invasive seraches of playersā personal devices, interrogate players without legal representation, and perform drug tests in the middle of the night

Another post on PTPAās X account
Looking Ahead + My Thoughts
My first reaction while reading through the allegations: there are three sides to every story ā your side, my side, and the truth.
Plaintiffs certainly did not mince words, both in their complaint and press release:
Lawsuits reveal how tennisā corrupt governing bodies systemically abuse, silence, and exploit players to drive personal profits through monopolistic control
Tennisā governing bodiesā wide-ranging and long-standing illegal practices have harmed players, fans, and the sport, and pose a grave threat to its future
Players seek a fair, transparent system that prioritizes their rights, health, and safety over the unchecked authority of the sportās governing bodies, ensuring they receive the same protections and opportunities as professional athletes in other global sports
Defendants will, if I had to guess, most likely deny, explain their side of things, attempt to dismiss the complaint, and raise several defenses. How successful those defenses will be remains uncertain.
But make no mistake, this lawsuit represents what could be a major change in the structure and governance of professional tennis.
Iām still surprised at the lack of coverage the lawsuit has received. March Madness has captured the sports world's attention, but the multi-party lawsuit contains jarring allegations and carries significant implications for the future of the sport.
Iāll be closely monitoring this one.
Conversation Starters š£ļø
Amir āAuraā Khan Earns Over $100k in NIL Deals š°
Who needs a Cinderella story when a team manager steals the show? Amir Khan, aka āAuraā, has headlined this yearās March Madness tournament. Khan inked deals with Buffalo Wild Wings, TickPick, Topps, and TurboTax to name a few. Next year, Khan will follow Coach Will Wade to NC State.
Former NFL, Michigan Coach Indicted on 24 Federal Charges š»
According to prosecutors, between 2015 and 2024, former Coach Matt Weiss gained unauthorized access to personal identifiable information and medical data of over 150,000 student-athletes. Weiss specifically targeted female college athletes and accessed photos and videos ānot meant to be shared beyond intimate partners.ā The former coach has pleaded not guilty.
Xavier Worthy Sues Ex-FiancĆ©e for Extortion, Abuse š
After the Chiefs WR was arrested earlier this month, the Texas DA announced they would not be filing charges. Worthy is now alleging his ex-fiancƩe damaged his property, stole 30k in cash, and ripped parts of his hair out. Worthy is seeking between $250k - $1M in damages, including punitive and exemplary damages.
And then there were 16! March Madness action resumes today. Hope your bracket isnāt too bustedā¦
Happy almost weekend,
Duggs
Know someone who will enjoy this edition? Share it with them and have them sign up here: https://thesideline.beehiiv.com/subscribe
Sources:
The Sidelineās work, including this article, is for information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. This article does not create an attorney-client relationship. The opinions expressed in the article belong solely to the author and do not express the views or opinions of the authorās employer.